As an unarmed citizen, how would you defend your family, your home and your life against an attack by a criminal if the local police department are slow to respond?

As an unarmed citizen, how would you defend your beloved country against a foreign or domestic enemy should she be under attack?

A government wishing to disarm its subjects only does so as means of tyranical control, usually prior to becoming a dictatorship or as means to suppress and prevent resistance to radical change.  Can we trust Obama?  Do you trust Obama?  I for one certainly do not.

The fact is, Barack Hussein Obama scares me.  How many more freedoms are you willing to give up?  What rights will you lose after the second amendment?  Will your right to speak out be silenced?  Will your right of free expression be suppressed? Will you be subject to tyranny?  America was founded on the beliefs of FREEDOM and our founding fathers secured our rights as means of protecting those freedoms.  Any political candidate whom goes against those unalienable rights is not a patriot, nor a friend of The United States of America.  Any presidential candidate that refuses to uphold and abide by the constitution does not represent We The People.

We The People will vote for John McCain this November. We The People will democratically elect John McCain as the President of The United States of America.  It is in our power to do so and we must, as “Change” is something great to FEAR when it comes from a man with something to hide.  Examine the facts, research the past and look at the possibilities!  What would happen if Obama succeded in eradicating or severely restricting legal gun ownership?  What happened after Hitler did the same?

In 1915 the Turkish government consfiscated guns from it’s Armenian citizens whom were then rounded up and sent to camps for extermination. 1,500,000+ Armenian citizens were murdered by the Turkish Government.

By 1935 the Nationalist government of China prohibited the citizens to own firearms.  From 1942 to 1944 four million people died from starvation when the government confiscated their crops.  Another four million were tortured and murdered when they didn’t join the military or were uncooperative. In 1937 hundreds of thousands of women and children in Nanking were defenseless against Japanese invaders due to the gun control laws forbidding them to defend themselves. They were raped, beaten, tortured, buried alive, burned alive and forced to watch as their own organs were cut out of them. The worst was in 1949 when the Communist regime murdered another 35 million Chinese. Some historians put the death toll by the Communist Chinese government as high as 100 million.  Chairman Mao was 100% correct when he stated that guns are the ultimate source of all political power.

Adolf Hitler was elected to power in January of 1933.  Because of gun control registration laws enacted 5 years earlier, Hitler already knew who owned the guns. Mass confiscation of firearms rendered the German people helpless. Hitler enacted another gun control law in 1938. The very day after Kristallnacht, a Nazi-led night of lawlessness and murder against Jews, the Jews were forbidden by law to own a gun, a club, or any sharp-edged weapon. Rendered defenseless, and with census data and National ID Cards identifying who was Jewish, it was easy for the nazis to arrest the Jews and send them to concentration camps. Over 5 million Jews were murdered in the nazi death camps. Nearly 21 million people were mudred by the nazis because they had been rendered defenseless by gun control laws.

Gun control certainly did not help the defenseless Tutsis of Rwanda in 1994. Unarmed and with their own government advocating violence against them, in just 100 days 800,000 Tutsis were killed. The Minister of Defense who granted permission for gun permits and kept track of the gun registry was also the one who happened to be in charge of the killing campaign. To prevent victims from trying to escape the killings, roadblocks were set up and National ID Cards were checked to identify individuals who were marked for death just for simply being who they were.

Throughout history there were numerous such accounts of death and murder of the people by its own government after enacting gun control laws. The crimes committed by these governments is an act of terrorism.  No true patriot to America would ever commit such a crime.  No true President would strip the American people of their rights as means of mass control to open the gateway to tyranny and oppression wether deliberate or under the guise of good intentions and it is my opinion and belief that Barack Hussein Obama’s alledged plan to eradicate legal gun ownership is a terrorist plot!  Is Barack Hussein Obama a terrorist?  He certainly is not a patriot sharing the same values and ideals of our founding fathers whom wrote the Declaration of Indenpendance, The Bill of Rights and the Constitution!  He appears very capable and willing to circumvent The Bill of Rights and The Constitution of the United States to take away your FREEDOMS and LIBERTIES .  

Ask yourself why?  Will you be safe as a citizen subject to the rule of Obama?

The following has been presented by the NRA.

Barack Obama`s 10 Point Plan to “Change” The Second Amendment

For the Brady Campaign, Violence Policy Center, Dianne Feinstein, Chuck Schumer, U.N. gun-ban extremist Rebecca Peters and her globalist billionaire sugar-daddy George Soros, for New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and his horde of big-city politicians—in fact, for all those individuals and organizations who would harm or destroy our Second Amendment rights—Barack Obama’s mantra of “change” means their agenda will be harnessed to the total power of an aggressive, activist and radical federal government.

“Change” means gun owners will be under siege like never before.

Especially for NRA members who fought through the never-ending threats of the Clinton-Gore administration, the understanding of “change” must be the driving force for us to get other gun owners to the polls. This election is critically important. We cannot afford to have any friend of the Second Amendment sit it out, regardless of the reason.

We all know gun owners who are disillusioned with politics. Those influenced by talk of four years of “progressives” in power coalescing a united conservative movement must be reminded that this November, we are not just electing a president, we are electing an entire government.

With Obama’s emphasis on grassroots organizing, his administration will be a government redesigned and realigned to stay in power. It will be a government converted into a political machine. And with a so-called “progressive” majority in both houses of Congress, there will be little to stop that power shift.

When Obama talks about “change,” the gun-banners at the Violence Policy Center and the Brady Campaign know exactly what change they want—inside power. And they’ll likely get it.

Michelle Obama, in a politically charged college campaign speech in California, defined her husband’s meaning of “change”:

“Barack Obama … is going to demand that you shed your cynicism. That you put down your division. That you come out of your isolation. That you move out of your comfort zones … Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual …”.

As NRA members, this statement doesn’t bode well for our future. Our “lives as usual” means the daily exercise of our freedom.

And what of “cynicism”? It is the very basis of Americans’ long history of questioning government power and its abuse. It is the basis of challenging dissembling politicians. Cynicism is the key to seeing through politicians like Obama and Hillary Clinton, who falsely wrap themselves in the Second Amendment while espousing dangerous programs for civil disarmament.

And “division”? As NRA members, our “division” from the likes of Obama means we stand together and fight every day against those who would destroy the bedrock principles that have made our country the freest in the world. Divisiveness is the basis of our democratic institutions. Division based on principle is a noble thing.

“Comfort zone”? What about the life, liberty and pursuit of happiness guaranteed by the Declaration of Independence? That is the real “comfort zone” of all Americans. We are the only nation on earth built on the principle of “pursuit of happiness.” That means we do not serve government; it serves us.

The “change” Obama and his close allies—like George Soros’ Moveon.org —seek is a complete regime change driven by a radical political agenda. For the nation’s gun owners, “change” will take the form of many steps back to the bad old days of the Clinton-Gore years or the Jimmy Carter years, when bureaucrats in a dozen agencies were relentless in their schemes to press a hostile presidential agenda against gun ownership.

For gun owners, “change” could well mean an erosion of hard-fought reforms and hard-fought protections we have secured over the years. Those reforms represent battles won by gun owners led by NRA since the founding of the Institute for Legislative Action in 1975.

“Change” means removing the restrictions we secured against the Consumer Product Safety Commission from exercising a bureaucratic ban on firearms or ammunition based on phony “consumer hazard” criteria. This is something the Brady Campaign and the Violence Policy Center have vainly sought for years.

… we are not just electing a president, we are electing an entire government

“Change” means ignoring the strictures imposed on federal gun-control enforcement by Congress, like preventing “firearms trace data” from being delivered into the hands of big-city lawyers to fuel punitive lawsuits to strangle the lawful firearms industry. This is New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s dream, and it is the “change” demanded by his gun-ban axis of urban politicians.

“Change” means an effort to erase all of the reforms of federal gun laws created when Congress enacted the Firearms Owners’ Protection Act of 1986. That law ended a reign of terror by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms that, for gun owners and civil libertarians, was the shameful hallmark of the Jimmy Carter presidency.

“Change” means that federal lawyers from multiple agencies with unlimited taxpayer funding will find “creative” ways to bring elements of the law-abiding firearm industry to court, circumventing the restrictions of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Firearms Act. As a freshman U.S. senator from Illinois, Obama voted against that law, which was designed to end punitive lawsuits claiming firearm industry liability based on totally unrelated acts of armed, violent criminals.

For those who don’t remember, in the waning days of the Bill Clinton presidency, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), along with the U.S. Department of Justice, used the threat of scores of separate lawsuits in many federal venues by city housing authorities to extort a supposedly “voluntary” gun-control agreement from firearm manufacturers. If Obama becomes president, you can bet the farm that bureaucrats will once again use these threats to obtain strictures that Congress would never enact.

In fact, among key advisors chosen by Obama to vet possible running mates is Eric Holder, who was Attorney General Janet Reno’s top deputy. Holder, as the Justice Department point man on all gun-control schemes, was among the top officials announcing the Clinton-Gore extortion agreement in 2000.
http://www.nraila.org/obama/

Posted on August 24th, 2008 by Enchantment and Disputation
Filed under: Bill Of Rights, Government, Gun Control, Guns, History, In The News, Politics, Presidential Election, Rants, Religion, Second Amendment, Terrorism, The US Constitution, Things That Piss Me Off, Thoughts